Atlas Dental Turkey
Under our open methodology this clinic scored 35.8/100 for the evidence-supported burden of complaints, transparency, credentials and reputation. İzmir, Turkey.
Rank #81 of 124 · Last checked 2026-07-13 · Methodology v1.1 · Confidence C
Assessed from 73 public reviews (13 Trustpilot · 60 Google)
Clinical accuracy reviewed by Dr Hasan Mustafa Najat · GDC 80316 · verifiable at olr.gdc-uk.org
Who this clinic is
We show what a clinic states versus what is independently verified. Registry checks (Ministry of Health / HealthTürkiye / dental council) are performed by our editors — items marked "pending" have not yet been independently verified.
What the ranking rests on
Ranking reflects evidence coverage (usable records across independent platforms) plus complaint record and editorial/clinical review. Credential, address-precision and evidence-window fields are published for transparency, not asserted beyond what the sources support. Full machine-readable eligibility for every clinic is in the clinic index.
Atlas Dental is a premium dental clinic in Izmir, Turkey, offering a wide range of services including implants, veneers, crowns, and smile makeovers. The clinic emphasizes modern technology, experienced dentists, and personalized care, with a focus on international patients.
- + Comprehensive service list
- + Clear contact details
- + English-language site
- + International patient coordination
- + Online consultation booking
- + Messaging/WhatsApp channel
- − No prices published
- − No operating licence shown
- − No dentist licence numbers
- − Address not fully detailed
- − No map published
2 qualified complaint incidents
1 serious (S3) · 1 critical (S4). Classified from third-party negative reviews under methodology v1.1 via structured, software-assisted collection and reviewed against the cited evidence by a named GDC-registered reviewer before publication.
The patient reported failed implants, missing bone grafts, prolonged pain, and refusal to provide implant ID, stating the experience almost cost their life.
The patient reported that a dentist named Fatma ruined a healthy tooth through repeated unsuccessful treatments, requiring ongoing care to avoid tooth loss.
Red-flag penalty applied: -6 points (capped at −20).
Every criterion is scored from public sources. ✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (scores 0, not a negative finding).
Reported separately — not in the editorial score
Search and AI discoverability measures SEO, not safety or treatment quality, so it does not affect a clinic's rank. We publish it for transparency only.
Clinic operating licence: not published on the clinic website
| Dentist | Specialisation | Licence no. |
|---|---|---|
| Dt. Fatma Kuvvetli | General Dentistry | not published |
| Dt. Yağız Çerçioğlu | General Dentistry | not published |
| Dt. Zeynep Hazal Yılmaz | Aesthetic Treatments | not published |
Unverified items score 0 but are not treated as negative findings. If you can document any, please send a correction.
- · Healthcare facility operating licence (verifiable)
- · International Health Tourism authorisation (where marketed to intl patients)
- · Treating dentists’ professional registrations independently verifiable
- · On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- · Surgical treatment capability
- · Documented sterilisation / hygiene protocol
- · Emergency-response arrangements
- · Written English aftercare instructions
- · Complete patient-record / documentation handover
- · Cross-border complication / remedy procedure
- · Bayesian-adjusted rating (prior 4.0, weight 25)
- · Review authenticity & platform diversity
- · Review recency & continuity
- · Substantive responses to reviews
- · Structured data on the site
- · Accessible machine-readable clinic identity
For identification only; may change — verify with the clinic directly.
Where the reviews come from
| Platform | Reviews assessed | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot | 13 | 2026-07-13 |
| 60 | 2026-07-13 |
Ratings are Bayesian-adjusted so a handful of five-star reviews cannot outweigh a documented complaint record. Negative reviews are classified as incidents in Complaint & Safety and are not deducted again here.
What we could and couldn’t confirm
- ✓ Working website
- ✓ Dentists named
- ✓ Service list published
- ✓ Clear contact details
- ✓ English-language site
- ✓ Healthcare facility operating licence (verifiable)
- ✓ English spoken
- ✓ Usable messaging / WhatsApp channel
- ✓ Pre-visit online consultation
- ✓ International-patient coordination
- ◐ Dentist specialisations listed
- ◐ Address & map published
- ? Prices or ranges published
- ? Implant price listed
- ? Crown price listed
- ? Consultation price listed
- ? International Health Tourism authorisation (where marketed to intl patients)
- ? Treating dentists’ professional registrations independently verifiable
- ? On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- ? Surgical treatment capability
- ? Documented sterilisation / hygiene protocol
- ? Emergency-response arrangements
Registry-level verification (Ministry of Health, HealthTürkiye, dental council, university records) is performed by our editors; items above reflect what is observable from public sources at the last check.
What the clinic has said
Right of reply offered on 2026-07-14 (response window to 2026-07-28). The clinic may correct facts, supply its authorisation, warranty and registration documents, and respond to any complaint; a response can change the score but cannot remove a documented complaint or buy a rank. Any response and its effect on the score is recorded here and in the change history.
- 2026-07-13 — Structured, software-assisted evidence collection under methodology v1.1; reviewed against the cited evidence by the assigned GDC-registered reviewer before publication.
Anyone — including Atlas Dental Turkey — can ask us to (re-)audit this clinic. This notifies our editors; they perform the review by hand against public evidence and record any score change in the public change log. It is free, applied the same way to every clinic, and payment never affects the outcome.
Corrections are reviewed against sources and applied with a public change-history entry. Report an error →