BULVARDİŞ
Under our open methodology this clinic scored 42.3/100 for the evidence-supported burden of complaints, transparency, credentials and reputation. Istanbul, Turkey.
Scored but not ranked · Confidence D (limited evidence coverage) · Last checked 2026-07-13 · Methodology v1.1 · Confidence D
Assessed from 62 public reviews (3 Trustpilot · 59 Google)
Clinical accuracy reviewed by Dr Amarat Kaur Bal · GDC 258552 · verifiable at olr.gdc-uk.org
Who this clinic is
We show what a clinic states versus what is independently verified. Registry checks (Ministry of Health / HealthTürkiye / dental council) are performed by our editors — items marked "pending" have not yet been independently verified.
What the ranking rests on
Ranking reflects evidence coverage (usable records across independent platforms) plus complaint record and editorial/clinical review. Credential, address-precision and evidence-window fields are published for transparency, not asserted beyond what the sources support. Full machine-readable eligibility for every clinic is in the clinic index.
BulvarDiş Ağız ve Diş Sağlığı Polikliniği, İstanbul'da uluslararası standartlarda modern diş hekimliği sunan bir sağlık kuruluşudur. 20 yılı aşkın deneyimle, koruyucu diş hekimliğinden estetik uygulamalara kadar geniş bir hizmet yelpazesi sunar ve hasta memnuniyetini merkeze alır.
- + Geniş tedavi yelpazesi
- + 20 yılı aşkın klinik deneyim
- + Uluslararası standartlarda hizmet
- + Kişiye özel tedavi planları
- + WhatsApp iletişim kanalı mevcut
- − Site Türkçe, İngilizce değil
- − Fiyat bilgisi yayınlanmamış
- − Doktor uzmanlıkları belirtilmemiş
- − Çalışma ruhsatı veya hekim kayıt numaraları verilmemiş
- − Online konsültasyon imkanı belirtilmemiş
3 qualified complaint incidents
2 serious (S3) · 0 critical (S4). Classified from third-party negative reviews under methodology v1.1 via structured, software-assisted collection and reviewed against the cited evidence by a named GDC-registered reviewer before publication.
The patient reported needing three visits for a simple filling that remained unresolved.
The patient reported that a wrong tooth extraction during orthodontic treatment required restarting aligner therapy elsewhere, and disrespectful remarks by a male staff member triggered dental phobia.
The patient reported gum problems after fillings and root canals, and a cracked tooth that split in half, with no positive results from the treatment.
Every criterion is scored from public sources. ✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (scores 0, not a negative finding).
Reported separately — not in the editorial score
Search and AI discoverability measures SEO, not safety or treatment quality, so it does not affect a clinic's rank. We publish it for transparency only.
Clinic operating licence: not published on the clinic website
| Dentist | Specialisation | Licence no. |
|---|---|---|
| DT. MEHMET KARAKURT | — | not published |
| DT. MELEK KECHAGIA | — | not published |
| DT. SERDAR KUŞARSLAN | — | not published |
| DT. DENİZ MUTLU | — | not published |
| DT. ÇAĞDAŞ AYDIN | — | not published |
| DT. ELİF GELGEÇ | — | not published |
Unverified items score 0 but are not treated as negative findings. If you can document any, please send a correction.
- · On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- · Documented sterilisation / hygiene protocol
- · Emergency-response arrangements
- · Written English aftercare instructions
- · Complete patient-record / documentation handover
- · Cross-border complication / remedy procedure
- · Bayesian-adjusted rating (prior 4.0, weight 25)
- · Review authenticity & platform diversity
- · Review recency & continuity
- · Substantive responses to reviews
- · Pre-visit online consultation
- · Structured data on the site
- · Accessible machine-readable clinic identity
For identification only; may change — verify with the clinic directly.
Where the reviews come from
| Platform | Reviews assessed | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot | 3 | 2026-07-13 |
| 59 | 2026-07-13 |
Ratings are Bayesian-adjusted so a handful of five-star reviews cannot outweigh a documented complaint record. Negative reviews are classified as incidents in Complaint & Safety and are not deducted again here.
What we could and couldn’t confirm
- ✓ Working website
- ✓ Dentists named
- ✓ Service list published
- ✓ Clear contact details
- ✓ Address & map published
- ✓ Healthcare facility operating licence (verifiable)
- ✓ Usable messaging / WhatsApp channel
- ◐ Dentist specialisations listed
- ◐ International Health Tourism authorisation (where marketed to intl patients)
- ◐ Surgical treatment capability
- ◐ International-patient coordination
- ? English-language site
- ? Prices or ranges published
- ? Implant price listed
- ? Crown price listed
- ? Consultation price listed
- ? Treating dentists’ professional registrations independently verifiable
- ? On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- ? Documented sterilisation / hygiene protocol
- ? Emergency-response arrangements
- ? Written English aftercare instructions
Registry-level verification (Ministry of Health, HealthTürkiye, dental council, university records) is performed by our editors; items above reflect what is observable from public sources at the last check.
What the clinic has said
Right of reply offered on 2026-07-14 (response window to 2026-07-28). The clinic may correct facts, supply its authorisation, warranty and registration documents, and respond to any complaint; a response can change the score but cannot remove a documented complaint or buy a rank. Any response and its effect on the score is recorded here and in the change history.
- 2026-07-13 — Structured, software-assisted evidence collection under methodology v1.1; reviewed against the cited evidence by the assigned GDC-registered reviewer before publication.
Anyone — including BULVARDİŞ — can ask us to (re-)audit this clinic. This notifies our editors; they perform the review by hand against public evidence and record any score change in the public change log. It is free, applied the same way to every clinic, and payment never affects the outcome.
Corrections are reviewed against sources and applied with a public change-history entry. Report an error →